See Text Version of Website

HOME | PODCAST | INTRODUCTION | LINKS | RSS FEEDS | EMAIL ME


Musings > Wednesday, 22 September 2010 18:47:48 EST

Why I Promote Intellectual Uncertainty

Keywords: epistemology, uncertainty

I often get emails and comments from people telling me that they don't think my alias suits me.  They feel like I'm undervaluing my contributions by calling myself a dumbass, and they tell me that the quality of my blog deserves a more appropriate name.

I appreciate the confidence in my abilities, and I am very happy to receive such high praise.  I always respond by telling them why I chose this name for my blog.  I've mentioned it before, but I think it bears repeating for anybody who hasn't read all my articles.

There's a quote from a book that I've just read that sums up my feelings about this perfectly.  This is from "Mistakes Were Made (But Not By Me)" by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson:

The unbending need to be right inevitably produces self-righteousness.  When confidence and convictions are unleavened by humility, by an acceptance of fallibility; people can easily cross the line from healthy self assurance to arrogance.

I call myself a dumbass because I don't want to fall into the trap of thinking that I know more than I do.  I don't want to fall into the trap of believing that I'm immune from the cognitive biases that affect everybody else.  People who think that they're immune are the easiest ones to fool.

Of course, I do feel the desire to pat myself on the back for what I see as my clearheaded analysis of dubious claims.  I have pride in my work.  What I wanted to balance that out was a constant reminder that I'm fallible.  That I'm just a dumbass like everybody else and I shouldn't take myself too seriously.

I may be the one on the soapbox here, but I don't expect anybody to take anything I have to say for granted.  I could very well be wrong, and it's even likely that I am wrong about something I've written here.  Even with all it's editors and fact checkers, the Encyclopedia Britannica still makes mistakes in every edition.

So in addition to reminding myself that I could be wrong, I want to encourage other people to feel comfortable challenging  me when they think I'm wrong.  I'm just some dumbass with a blog, please don't just take my word for anything!

If I got my facts wrong, I definitely want to know about it.


Search


Categories:
Latest Comments:
On 6/20/2017
at 5:35am
John Ahmed wrote:

We are Russell Financial Company Ltd located in America and other Europe countries, we offers both personal and investment...
(more)

On 6/5/2017
at 11:57pm
Bernie wrote:

This site is crazy :) <a href" http://www.icptf.com/index.php?optionmotrinbabydosagechartliquid.pdf ">motrin liquid gels coupon oise</a> The U.S. government was bracing for...
(more)

On 6/5/2017
at 1:57pm
Julian wrote:

Very interesting tale <a href" http://empatiacomunicacion.com/methotrexateinjectionsites.pdf ">methotrexate injections for ra</a> Ana Navarro, a GOP strategist, thankfully decided that she'd...
(more)

On 6/4/2017
at 5:20pm
Wilmer wrote:

I sing in a choir <a href" http://vallashopen.se/crocindropsbuyonline.pdf ">cost of crocin advance</a> Falcone admitted wrongdoing and agreed to pay...
(more)

On 6/4/2017
at 2:57pm
Darryl wrote:

How many weeks' holiday a year are there? <a href" https://www.citis.com.br/clomidtabletsingredientsmp3.pptxgrowing ">buy cheap clomid uk jsaonline</a> Of late, multiple...
(more)


Blog Entries: